
This, by the way, is my 1000th post on the Potwell Inn.
I just seem to keep going and people just seem to keep reading my stuff and whatever my stats lack in reach they certainly make up for in the quality of the readers. Please feel free to raise a glass to the Landlord of the Potwell Inn who’s feeling a bit chipper today. The next big celebration will be when we reach 1,000,000 words – hopefully by the end of the year; and remember you can search the whole site on any word at all – not just the featured keywords. Happy browsing.
I once went to the GP with a very painful big toe. He examined my foot intently; moved the joint until I winced; sat back in his chair and pronounced – “you’ve got hallux rigidus”. I believe the expected response is to whisper “How long have I got Doc?” but happily, and entirely due to the efforts of some of my teachers who thought it was important to teach even oiks like us a bit of Latin, I curled my lip and said – “That just means stiff toe, and I knew that already”. As Sam Weller might have said – “Collapse of stout party”.
Latin can be a real obstacle to botanists and gardeners alike. It can be used defensively to lock out the great unwashed or in attack by making earnest apprentices feel stupid. Yesterday’s post – “The Three Graces – a rainy day job” called for a fair bit of searching through a heap of floras. I can’t resist buying them, but when it comes to taking them out on field trips they’re often too heavy or too obscure to contemplate carrying around all day. The other enduring flaw is the overuse of Latin terms which make sure you spend as much time in the glossary at the back as you do looking at the plant itself. I’ve even got two large volumes of Latin terms that can slow an identification down to a crawl. At this point I’m not moaning about the Latin names of plants because – although I’m not a taxonomist (there you go again), I do understand perfectly well that if a species isn’t given a name that’s the same wherever on earth it’s found, we’ll get utterly bogged down in misunderstandings. So of course we need the Latin, alongside the Linnaean binomial system: surname followed by forename so not only am I one of the Poles, I’m not Lancelot Pole or indeed Lady Margaret Pole – because she’s been dead for centuries – but Dave Pole; landlord of the Potwell Inn which doesn’t exist except in my fantasy.
So now we’ve cleared that up I would also want to say that I absolutely love the English names of plants. Any plant name beginning with viper’s, dog’s and devil’s, or ends with bane attracts me as a moth to a flame. Geoffrey Grigson’s book of English plant names is pure poetry in my eyes – after all he was a poet – and so often the English plant name gives a clue to an ancient use. Scabious and perhaps in particular Devil’s-bit Scabious was used to cure scabies and it was, so legend has – so effective that the Devil himself spitefully bit the root off. Pilewort I’ll leave you to work out, and Scrophularia seems suggestive of the apothecary’s shelf too. I could take you to the exact place on a clifftop in Tenby where I saw Viper’s Bugloss for the first time. and the poor old adjective dog has been attached to so many less than exciting plants it should probably sue. The fact that I once, at the age of about ten, heard dandelions being referred to by an old man in Pucklechurch as Piss the Bed as we walked back from the Rose and Crown Inn at Parkfield, has lodged forever in my memory. Corn Marigold and Marsh Thistle give important clues about their habitats.
So which flora do I most often take out in my bag for a day’s botanising? As ever there’s a story attached. While I was still struggling through the botanical foothills I was once on my knees on a footpath in St Brides Bay, Pembrokeshire examining some Hemlock Water Dropwort, when I was stepped over by a tall and somewhat tweedy scotswoman who stopped to ask me what I was looking at. I explained as best I could and she was enormously helpful and encouraging. It transpired that she was a professional and teacher of botany so I plucked up my courage and asked her if she could recommend a flora for a relative beginner. She told me that she always advised her students to get hold of a copy of the revised edition of Francis Rose’s “Wildflower Key” revised by Clare O’Reilly. It’s a little out of date in places and the illustrations could be better but of all the floras lined up in my bookcase, it’s the most battered because the keys and identification hints are so good. Like all old friends it takes a while to build a relationship with it, but when I pick up my copy I get the warm feeling that comes with knowing that even if I don’t get the full species name, I’ll get close enough to make my homework much easier – and yes, I also use Stace and all the others. One of these days I’ll honour my promise to write about the wonderful resources available to newcomers online but meanwhile the best way forward for anyone wanting to find out about our UK wildflowers would be to join a natural history society and go out on some field trips; and to join the BSBI (Botanical Society of Britain and Ireland).
Happy hunting!























At home the summer window boxes are all inside now and we’ll be taking cuttings for next year. Tomorrow looks set to be wet from the outset. Before we left this morning, I sorted out a corner of my room because we’ve decided to have a ‘drawing day’. I aim to spend an hour or so doing the colour swatches tonight so that I can begin the first draft paintings tomorrow. It’s fascinating to see how different “daylight” lamps can be from one manufacturer to another. I prefer to work with quite high light levels to bring out all the subtleties of colour, and for very fine work I use a big desk magnifier, so you can see three distinct ‘daylight colour’ sets on my desk, and I have to negotiate my way through the various options.
The last time I actually studied biology I was 13 years old and determined to drop the subject as soon as I could. I don’t know quite why, it was probably to do with the teachers we had. The biology teacher was very young and we were a pretty unruly class, given to asking silly questions that were certain to make him blush – he blushed easily. His nemesis was – let’s call her Jolene – who was reputed to be a great comfort to the sixth form boys and therefore an object of awe to the rest of us. Jolene collected detentions like most of us collect loyalty stamps, and one day she discovered how easy it was to escape confinement by lifting up her dress and showing our biology teacher her knickers. Word got around and the class descended into anarchy. Being a bit of a geek, I thought I’d be better off doing physics so I defected to the subject that had an inspirational teacher known by us all as Jinks, whose lessons were never less than exciting and often featured electric shocks and explosions, and that’s one of those odd bifurcations in the road that sent me off in another direction than the subject of the little diagram above while I still knew next to nothing about biology. Until this week.
